Online Now 557

The Junkyard

Where Dawg fans hunker down

On this Board 216
Record: 3373 (4/23/2012)

Online now 582
Record: 3990 (6/13/2012)

Reply

*** The 25-man signing cap and backcounting explained (link)

  • Very good read by my friend Jon Solomon of The Birmingham News that helps answer quite a few questions that have been discussed in the Yard.

    SEC learning to live with new 25-player signing cap

    Barring opposition, new rule will go into effect for all of NCAA on Aug. 1.

    www.al.com
    signature image

    GET AT ME ----- E-MAIL: gestes@247sports.com ----- TWITTER: @GentryEstes247 ---- FACEBOOK: http://www.facebook.com/dawgs247

    Gentry Estes

  • TTT

    Feels like this might be a useful post in the coming days...

    Nicolae

  • Thanks G. Knowledge is power!

    signature image signature image signature image

    BullyMack

  • Great read, thx for sharing. I had us at 63 on scholly before signing day, which includes the 2 early enrollees. We signed 17, not counting the 2 early, bringing us up to 80 but we lost 3 more with the recent suspensions so we're currently at 77. We have 14 Sr's on the roster and added to the 8 spots open right now we'll have a minimum of 22 'ships for next year. However, that number will almost assuredly increase due to Jr's going pro (Jones, Ogletree), medical issues, academics, etc. Bottom line, we really need to sign a full class of 25 next year, and could have used a few more in this class. Chances are we'll have more spots to fill than the max of 25.

    I think my math is correct. This stuff is harder than my Calculus classes on South Campus.

    This post was edited by TwoDown71 on 2/3/2012 at 4:59 PM

    TwoDown71

  • This raises another question for me. What about players who have red shirted earlier and yet play through their Senior season? Is that scholarship available if they have graduated but still have a season left? For example, we have a wr on this team who red shirted and will graduate in May. He will be a senior next season on the team but will have already graduated from UGA. Is he still a scholarship player or not?

  • So, what I take from this is we signed 19 but 3 were EEs who were backcounted so that means 16 will count as initial enrollees in June meaning we could, at least theoretically, sign as many as 9 EEs next December and backcount them....and still sign a full 25 next February...IF...we could still meet the overall 85 cap by the following June.

    (Think we'll be able to sign plenty next year but don't know if we could actualy get that many in...but there are lots of kids who aren't going to play much and could leave over the next 12 months.)

    Boy.... I'd love to bring in 34 in one year and watch Satan cry about how did Ga do that under the new rules?

    wayx

  • This post is for members of Dawgs247 or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial

    Born and bred Bulldog, living in Maryland since '88

    furrier

  • This post is for members of Dawgs247 or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial

    wayx

  • If you only count players that originally came in on scholarship, we will have 23 spots open next year not counting any juniors leavig early. if Jarvis, Alec, and Kwame leave early that puts us at 26 open scholarships. We average 6-8 in attrtion each year. Let's say we lose 10 over the next 18 months, which is a normal amount of attrition for that amount of time (including the NFL early departures). That puts us at likely having 33 open spots when it counts(not on NSD).

    We can only count back scholarships that were open the previous season for EEs. Last year we only used 83 scholarships after we gave 8 walkons scholarships, so only 2 of our 3 EEs back count. So we can technically take up to 33 including 8 EEs, and every walk on that gets a scholarship takes away from that number. There is no limit of 3 EEs per year.. I've seen that but apparently that isn't the case.

    sega

  • And you can take as many EEs as you want.. but you can only back count as many as you had open the previous season. That's how Bama had 8 EEs. They don't back count, but they do get to go through spring practice and get a jump start on S&C.

    sega

  • sega said...

    And you can take as many EEs as you want.. but you can only back count as many as you had open the previous season. That's how Bama had 8 EEs. They don't back count, but they do get to go through spring practice and get a jump start on S&C.

    I found this very informative. I had been wondering how bama was able to pull off 8 EE's when the limit was 3. So how many would we be able to back date for this coming year? With only 19 signees this year, I would think that it will be more than 3.

    greenedaddy

  • Technically we only had 17 signees this year because 2 of our 3 EEs backcount to 2011 since we only used 83 scholarships last season. We can backcount up to 8 next year(25 limit minus 17 the previous year), but that number ultimately depends on how many scholarships we use this fall. So let's say we have 8 open scholarships this fall, then award 5 walkons scholarships. That would leave us only using 82 scholarships, so then we will only be able to sign a max of 28 in the 2013 class with 3 back counting to the 2012 class.

    It all depends on how generous we are with walkons this fall and how many more players leave. We could allow ourselves to sign up to 33, but I think as long as we leave room for 30 we would be in good shape. That gives us room for 7 more early departures between now and the fall of 2013. We would almost assuredly be under the 85 again, but not as bad as we are now.

    sega

  • wayx said...

    So, what I take from this is we signed 19 but 3 were EEs who were backcounted so that means 16 will count as initial enrollees in June meaning we could, at least theoretically, sign as many as 9 EEs next December and backcount them....and still sign a full 25 next February...IF...we could still meet the overall 85 cap by the following June.

    (Think we'll be able to sign plenty next year but don't know if we could actualy get that many in...but there are lots of kids who aren't going to play much and could leave over the next 12 months.)

    Boy.... I'd love to bring in 34 in one year and watch Satan cry about how did Ga do that under the new rules?

    You honestly think Saban doesn't understand the new rules with recruiting? Seriously?

    signature image

    jimmydana1

  • jimmydana1 said...

    You honestly think Saban doesn't understand the new rules with recruiting? Seriously?

    nm

    This post was edited by CCDawg on 2/5/2012 at 7:34 AM

    signature image signature image signature image

    CCDawg

  • It still appears to me that there are so many exceptions, that the rules can be manipulated anyway you want almost. In order for the new requirement to have any affect, you will have to throw in hard and fast rules concerning how you get rid of a athlete not living up to the standards the coach wants on the playing field. They just need to make it a hard number and be done with it. I would think 25 is a good base, and sign three that count from the previous year. Hold the overall total to 85, and then all this crap about over signing would be done and over with. If you were going to have an exception to that number, it would have to be if a player was permanently disqualified due to injury. If a kid flunks out due to academics or misconduct, that's a lick on you, and you just carry on. Maybe then, you might even be able to say student and athlete in the same sentence without laughing most of the time. The big 10 is even trying to institute a rule that requires the kid to be offered a minimum of a 3 year minimum scholarship, and I think that has it's merits as well. Then you might see actual student athletes, but with all the tutoring and special admits and such, not a whole lot more. What the big 10's rule will most likely do is prevent some borderline academic kid, with great athletic skills end up either missing out, or go to a JUCO to get his grades up. With a 3 year scholarship minimum coaches just couldn't throw out scholarships anymore to tweeners, because they would have to allow him to be in school at least 3 years, tying up their scholarship.
    It really doesn't matter what the NCAA, SEC, big 10, or any other conferences does, some coaches will strill figure out a way to get around it. In the end the kids are going to be the victim of some of the practices by certain coaches. Some where along the road, more consideration has got to be given to the young kid and pulling in the coaches that continue to stretch the rules and look for every little loop hole they can use.

    RedandBlackDawg

  • sega said...

    Technically we only had 17 signees this year because 2 of our 3 EEs backcount to 2011 since we only used 83 scholarships last season. We can backcount up to 8 next year(25 limit minus 17 the previous year), but that number ultimately depends on how many scholarships we use this fall. So let's say we have 8 open scholarships this fall, then award 5 walkons scholarships. That would leave us only using 82 scholarships, so then we will only be able to sign a max of 28 in the 2013 class with 3 back counting to the 2012 class.

    It all depends on how generous we are with walkons this fall and how many more players leave. We could allow ourselves to sign up to 33, but I think as long as we leave room for 30 we would be in good shape. That gives us room for 7 more early departures between now and the fall of 2013. We would almost assuredly be under the 85 again, but not as bad as we are now.

    Great explanation, thx Sega. I can't believe we're almost 10 percent below our scholarship limit this fall, especially when you see that 4 of the past 6 NC's have signed 14+ more players than their opponents over that time. I understand the complaints about oversigning but it seems we're taking it the opposite direction. I believe Auburn was the only program that signed fewer recruits than us this past year. We really need to build some quality depth and soon.

    TwoDown71

  • RedandBlackDawg said...

    It still appears to me that there are so many exceptions, that the rules can be manipulated anyway you want almost. In order for the new requirement to have any affect, you will have to throw in hard and fast rules concerning how you get rid of a athlete not living up to the standards the coach wants on the playing field. They just need to make it a hard number and be done with it. I would think 25 is a good base, and sign three that count from the previous year. Hold the overall total to 85, and then all this crap about over signing would be done and over with. If you were going to have an exception to that number, it would have to be if a player was permanently disqualified due to injury. If a kid flunks out due to academics or misconduct, that's a lick on you, and you just carry on. Maybe then, you might even be able to say student and athlete in the same sentence without laughing most of the time. The big 10 is even trying to institute a rule that requires the kid to be offered a minimum of a 3 year minimum scholarship, and I think that has it's merits as well. Then you might see actual student athletes, but with all the tutoring and special admits and such, not a whole lot more. What the big 10's rule will most likely do is prevent some borderline academic kid, with great athletic skills end up either missing out, or go to a JUCO to get his grades up. With a 3 year scholarship minimum coaches just couldn't throw out scholarships anymore to tweeners, because they would have to allow him to be in school at least 3 years, tying up their scholarship. It really doesn't matter what the NCAA, SEC, big 10, or any other conferences does, some coaches will strill figure out a way to get around it. In the end the kids are going to be the victim of some of the practices by certain coaches. Some where along the road, more consideration has got to be given to the young kid and pulling in the coaches that continue to stretch the rules and look for every little loop hole they can use.

    There IS a "hard" signing limit of 28 now, in the SEC. The article doesn't say anything about it, but previous articles from the time of the conference meetings last spring pointed it out.

    Born and bred Bulldog, living in Maryland since '88

    furrier

  • furrier said...

    There IS a "hard" signing limit of 28 now, in the SEC. The article doesn't say anything about it, but previous articles from the time of the conference meetings last spring pointed it out.

    I just searched briefly, and I've been unable to verify my memory on this. I conclude that I may be wrong on this :). I'll look in a little more depth when I have time, but until that time let's go with sega's understanding.

    Born and bred Bulldog, living in Maryland since '88

    furrier

  • furrier said...

    There IS a "hard" signing limit of 28 now, in the SEC. The article doesn't say anything about it, but previous articles from the time of the conference meetings last spring pointed it out.

    That rule was about signing more than 28, qualifying or not, in one year. It was intended to stop the signing and placing like Ole Miss was doing when they signed 37 kids one year and a lot of them were just sign and place kids. The previous rules only dealt with how many you enroll. That 28 rule still didn't prevent back counting, which is how UGA could still sign as many as 33 this class, because only 25 of those would be counted on the 2013 class and 8 would be counted on the 2012 class along with the 17 original signees.

    sega