Online Now 1327

Get 30 days FREE to Dawgs247

Get VIP access to all recruiting updatesClick here to get started

Advertisement

The Junkyard

Where Dawg fans hunker down

On this board 469
Record: 1495 (1/13/2012)

Online now 1341
Record: 2914 (1/13/2012)

Reply

To those pointing to Marcell Dareus ...

  • I covered the Dareus investigation and have a pretty good take on that situation. While I will not defend the NCAA's actions as it pertains to A.J. Green, here's a little background on the Dareus saga at Alabama that I've not noticed on many Georgia forums today.

    Going off NCAA "starting point" guidelines, both Dareus and Green should have received four games for the dollar amount of each violation.

    Basically, Dareus was the exception, and Green was the rule. The NCAA cited "mitigating circumstances" in the case of Dareus getting a two-game suspension instead of a four-game suspension, which the NCAA admitted was called for in Alabama's situation.

    What does that mean?

    *** Well, for one, Dareus' mother died in May, which is when the trips to Miami allegedly took place. The person responsible for talking him into going down there was a friend and fellow player -- Marvin Austin, the UNC player that is in so much trouble -- who said (through Twitter) that he wanted to cheer Dareus up. That doesn't excuse breaking the rules, but it does help explain the situation a bit better.

    *** A good source at UA has told me that the school started it's own compliance investigation into Dareus on a Sunday after receiving calls from media asking about it (Yours truly included). My understanding is that UGA, meanwhile, was notified by the NCAA first. That's a big difference. It always helps in the NCAA's eyes to look as though you're keeping your own kitchen clean. But in UGA's defense, it's not like the athletics department has been on real stable footing these past few weeks and months.

    *** Without question, Dareus should have checked with Alabama's compliance staff before heading to Miami, but he did not. That said, UA compliance officials remained convinced that Dareus was telling the truth when he said he didn't know he was breaking the rules because he did not know an agent was somehow involved.

    *** Along those lines, here is the statement issued by Alabama's compliance director Mike Ward in the wake of the Dareus decision ...

    "We are appreciative of the NCAA’s efforts in this matter. It is important to note that Marcell never intentionally violated any NCAA rules and did not knowingly receive any benefits from an agent. Marcell lived up to the letter and spirit of the NCAA cooperative principle and the NCAA described him as 'one of the most truthful student-athletes we have ever interviewed.' While the institution weighs the decision to appeal, we will continue to pursue all available means to protect our student-athletes and their families from agents and financial advisors willing to compromise or exploit them. We will assist the NCAA, NFL, NFLPA, and any interested state and federal regulatory bodies in their prosecution, regulation, or sanctioning of individuals who disregard legislation pertaining to our student-athletes."

    *** Alabama did not appeal, by the way, after Nick Saban first said that it would. Per NCAA rules, the player would be ineligible for the length of the appeal, so it would make no sense in Dareus' case. Georgia, meanwhile, has nothing to lose in appealing the Green decision.

    This post has been edited 5 times, most recently by Gentry Estes on 9/9/2010 at 10:39 AM

      GET AT ME ----- E-MAIL: gestes@247sports.com ----- TWITTER: @Dawgs247 and @GentryEstes247 ---- FACEBOOK: http://www.facebook.com/dawgs247

      Gentry Estes

      • Avatar
      • Badge
    • Gentry,
      Thanks for the information on the Dareus situtaion, but his mom being dying has zero to do with this. It shouldn't be part of the excuse making for Dareus. If the NCAA is going to believe his feeble story of he didn't know something was wrong getting not just 1, but 2 trips to miami then they should believe AJ Green that he did not know hawkins was a runner. If anyone believes a guy takes 2 trips to miami and goes to parties (don't believe there was not a party for the players when they were down there) and sees NOTHING there then you will believe anything. Alabama didn't appeal because they got a great deal already with 2 games knocked off. The bottom line is if Dareus gets 2 games for what he received and what he did there is no reason for AJ Green to not get the same. Most everyone believes AJ Green's punishment is excessive and this has opened up a can of worms nationally.

      This post was edited by Dawgsfan1973 on 9/10/2010 at 9:20 PM

        Dawgsfan1973